For authors

“Journal of Eastern European Law” is included in the List of scientific professional editions of Ukraine in accordance with the Order of the Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine No.455dated 15.04.2014. 

Journal of Eastern European Lawis included in databases Index Copernicus International (Poland) December 2014 and HeinOnline since February 2015.

Certificate_Copernicus

логотип

Articles presented to the editor to the last day of the current month will be published in the journal next month. The journal is published on the 25th of each month.

To publish an article in the scientific journal “Journal of Eastern European Law” please send by e-mail easternlaw.ua@gmail.com the following materials:

1) electronic version of the article *;

2) in the absence of a scientific degree of the author – a scanned contribution review of doctor or candidate of sciences;

3) a scanned copy of the receipt of the registration fee for the publication **;

4) The photo of the author (optional).

An example of the name of the file: Petrov_article, Petrov_review, Petrov_receipt, Petrov_photo.

Articles are published in author’s edition. The editors of scientific publications “Journal of Eastern European Law” are not responsible for spelling, stylistic or other mistakes made by the author of the publication.

The cost of publication is 350 UAH. Recipient: PJSC CB “Privat”, account number: 29244825509100, MFO: 305299, OKPO: 14360570 Payment: refill Sokolan Tetyana S. No. 5168 7572 1085 4172.

Please notice that edition accepts articles written in literate English free of charge.

The editorial office of scientific publication “Journal of Eastern European Law” address: 57/3, Velyka Vasylkivska Str, Kyiv, 03150, Higher education institution “University of Modern Knowledge”

Telephone: +38 (093) 527 17 96 Tetyana Sokolan.

We accept for publication in the journal in the form of articles the results of original research, practical and educational research that have not previously been published and are wrutten in Ukrainian, Russian or English, and meet the following requirements:

1) formulation of the issue in general and its connection with important scientific and practical tasks (“Issue“);

2) analysis of recent research and publications in which a solution of the problem supported by the author is started (“Analysis of recent research and publications“);

3) the allocation of unallocated parts of the general problem, to which the article is devoted (“Unsolved problems“);

4) a statement of the purposes of article (problem) (“Purpose“);

5) a statement of the basic research material with full justification of scientific results (“The main body“);

6) The findings of this study and the prospects for further research in this area (“Conclusion“).

These items are in the manuscript in bold.

- UDC;

- First name, last name and patronymic of the author, academic degree, academic rank, position;

- Title of the article;

- Abstract in Ukrainian, Russian, English;

- Abstract in English must contain at least 240 words, abstract in Russian and Ukrainian language – not less than 30 words. The editorial office can do the translation of extended abstracts in English for an additional fee (70 UAH);

- Keywords (5-7);

- The main text of the article;

- A list of sources used, designed in accordance with state standards.

The article should be typed in text editor Microsoft Word. All margins – 20 mm. Font – Times New Roman 14, with 1.5 line spacing. Be sure to add in a separate file – an electronic photo of the author a 4 × 5,5 with the extension * jpg. quality 600 x 600 dpi.

The references are quoted directly in the text.

Please quote the serial number of the used source in brackets, and the particular page after a comma.

Manuscripts that do not meet these requirements will not be accepted for publication.

Example of the manuscript

УДК [351.74:621.397.4] (477)

Петров Петро Павлович –

кандидат юридичних наук, доцент,

 доцент кафедри адміністративного права

Київського національного університету

 імені Тараса Шевченка

ВІДЕОЗАПИС ЯК ДЖЕРЕЛО ДОКАЗІВ: НОТАТКИ ДО НАУКОВОЇ ДИСКУСІЇ

У статті розглянуто положення процесуального законодавства щодо поводження з таким доказом, як відеозапис, зроблено висновок про неможливість віднесення відеозапису до речових доказів і документів, а також запропоновано надати відеозапису статусу окремого джерела доказів.

Ключові слова: доказ, джерела доказів, відеозапис, судове провадження, позасудове провадження, процесуальне законодавство.

В статье рассмотрены положения процессуального законодательства каса- тельно обращения с таким доказательством, как видеозапись, сделан вывод о невозможности отнесения видеозаписи к вещественным доказательствам и документам, а также предложено предоставить видеозаписи статус отдельного источника доказательства.

Ключевые слова: доказательство, источник доказательств, видеозапись, судебное производство, внесудебное производство, процессуальное законодательство.

Petrov P.P. Videotape as a Source of Evidence: Notes to a Scholarly Dispute

The article deals with provisions of procedural legislation on giving definition to evidence and a videotape as one of its types. A videotape can refer both to physical evidence and documents pursuant to the provisions of procedural codes. But the author disagrees with these provisions. He mentions that procedural code identifies the document as a material object which is specially created to keep information and can be used as a proof of facts or circumstances during criminal proceeding. But the legislator provided such definition of the document without analyzing a semantic meaning of this word. A document is interpreted in the definition dictionary as 1) an official paper that proves some legal fact, certificates something, serves as an evidence of something. It is everything what confirms something. Commercial paper. 2) a certificate which tests the person; 3) a written essay, commendation etc. which proves something important or historical; 4) a paper which is created to be filled in. In this regard the author draws a conclusion that a document is a paper and a videotape can not be addressed as a paper. Physical evidence is items of the physical world which contain information on circumstances important for the case. Some procedural codes say that physical evidence includes magnetic, electronic and other data storage devices which contain audiovisual information on circumstances having the meaning for the case. In such a way a videotape can be the type of physical evidence. But a videotape does not correspond to the definition of a physical videotape which is contained in procedural codes. Magnetic, electronic and other data storage devices are items containing information which can be helpful to establish important circumstances. This information can be obtained from the content of these items through special equipment. This process differs from the process of examining physical or written evidence when their material from is examined. In this regard the author makes a conclusion that the legislator referring a videotape to physical evidence or documents does not want to take into account transformations in the world including progress in science and technology. In turn it tries to explain new facts with old definitions. The author does not accept this position and proposes to provide a videotape with the status of an independent type of evidence. The author proves that this step will assist judges to have a more serious attitude to this type of evidence and take it into account during the trial. In this regard the author offers to amend procedural legislation in force with a provision that factual circumstances can be established by audio- and videotapes and allocate in separate section procedure for handling with this evidence. The author analyzes procedure of using videotape in a non-judicial process. She considers provisions of the Code of Ukraine on Administrative Offences and makes a conclusion that this law does not regulate handling with videotapes during procedures on administrative offences which are conducted by the representatives of public administration agencies. Thus propositions on amending procedural judicial legislation can be used in a non-judicial process. The author also proposes to amend the draft law on Administrative Procedural Code of Ukraine with provisions concerning videotape.

Keywords: evidence, source of evidence, videotape, judicial procedure, non-judicial procedure, procedural legislation.

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Twitter
  • RSS